↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating natural experiments in ecology: using synthetic controls in assessments of remotely sensed land treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating natural experiments in ecology: using synthetic controls in assessments of remotely sensed land treatments
Published in
Ecological Applications, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/eap.2264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen E. Fick, Travis W. Nauman, Colby C. Brungard, Michael C. Duniway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,093,362
of 19,555,311 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,231
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,132
of 470,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#38
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,555,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.