↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating natural experiments in ecology: using synthetic controls in assessments of remotely sensed land treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating natural experiments in ecology: using synthetic controls in assessments of remotely sensed land treatments
Published in
Ecological Applications, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/eap.2264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen E. Fick, Travis W. Nauman, Colby C. Brungard, Michael C. Duniway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#9,892,686
of 17,854,173 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,118
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,482
of 414,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#41
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,854,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.