↓ Skip to main content

Teaching International Development Locally: Using Museum Collections to Ground Students’ Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Teaching Sociology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Teaching International Development Locally: Using Museum Collections to Ground Students’ Learning
Published in
Teaching Sociology, November 2020
DOI 10.1177/0092055x20966719
Authors

Shiri Noy, Megan Hancock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 40%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,077,845
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Teaching Sociology
#325
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,647
of 530,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Teaching Sociology
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.