↓ Skip to main content

Commercial versus home-made spacers in delivering bronchodilator therapy for acute therapy in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commercial versus home-made spacers in delivering bronchodilator therapy for acute therapy in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005536.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Monica Sossa, Juan Manuel Lozano

Abstract

Strong evidence supports the use of metered-dose inhalers combined with a spacer for delivering rapid-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists in the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma in children. The high cost and lack of availability of commercially produced spacers however, have limited their use in developing countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 34 34%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 20 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#889,053
of 18,888,807 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,189
of 11,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,574
of 145,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,888,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.