↓ Skip to main content

The Neonicotinoid Insecticide Imidacloprid Disrupts Bumblebee Foraging Rhythms and Sleep

Overview of attention for article published in iScience, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
36 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Neonicotinoid Insecticide Imidacloprid Disrupts Bumblebee Foraging Rhythms and Sleep
Published in
iScience, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101827
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiah Tasman, Sean A. Rands, James J.L. Hodge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 47%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#199,885
of 22,135,342 outputs
Outputs from iScience
#96
of 4,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,442
of 501,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from iScience
#10
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,135,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.