↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of three techniques for genetic estimation of effective population size in a critically endangered parrot

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Conservation, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,345)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
108 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
254 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of three techniques for genetic estimation of effective population size in a critically endangered parrot
Published in
Animal Conservation, December 2020
DOI 10.1111/acv.12655
Authors

G. Olah, D. Stojanovic, M. H. Webb, R. S. Waples, R. Heinsohn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 254 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1030. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,243
of 26,287,478 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#2
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#638
of 533,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,287,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.