Title |
Epistemonikos: a comprehensive database of systematic reviews for health decision-making
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01157-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabriel Rada, Daniel Pérez, Felipe Araya-Quintanilla, Camila Ávila, Gonzalo Bravo-Soto, Rocío Bravo-Jeria, Aldo Cánepa, Daniel Capurro, Victoria Castro-Gutiérrez, Valeria Contreras, Javiera Edwards, Jorge Faúndez, Damián Garrido, Magdalena Jiménez, Valentina Llovet, Diego Lobos, Francisco Madrid, Macarena Morel-Marambio, Antonia Mendoza, Ignacio Neumann, Luis Ortiz-Muñoz, José Peña, Marcelo Pérez, Franco Pesce, Carmen Rain, Solange Rivera, Javiera Sepúlveda, Mauricio Soto, Felipe Valverde, Juan Vásquez, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Camilo Vergara, Cynthia Zavala, Ricardo Zilleruelo-Ramos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 43 | 29% |
Spain | 14 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 7% |
Australia | 4 | 3% |
Colombia | 4 | 3% |
United States | 4 | 3% |
Argentina | 3 | 2% |
Mexico | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 103 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 14% |
Scientists | 20 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#397,591
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#30
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,083
of 527,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.