You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ciliopathies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmra1010172 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert S. Schwartz, Friedhelm Hildebrandt, Thomas Benzing, Nicholas Katsanis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 437 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 11% |
| Researcher | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 91 | 20% |
| Unknown | 98 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 129 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Unknown | 107 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#773,284
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,344
of 32,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,728
of 121,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#45
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.