↓ Skip to main content

James E. Vanderplank: South African and globally recognised plant pathologist

Overview of attention for article published in South African Journal of Science, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
James E. Vanderplank: South African and globally recognised plant pathologist
Published in
South African Journal of Science, November 2020
DOI 10.17159/sajs.2020/8264
Authors

Teresa A. Coutinho, André Drenth, Michael J. Wingfield

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,968,172
of 18,863,398 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#684
of 1,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,939
of 445,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,863,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them