↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006768.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitchell Scheiman, Marjean T Kulp, Susan A Cotter, John G Lawrenson, Lin Wang, Tianjing Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,858,362
of 17,071,340 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,525
of 11,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,735
of 390,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,071,340 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.