@kprather88 This study - also of actual real world masking (in a mandate) - is also good. https://t.co/meNEeYumXw
@KarlSinclair10 @ABridgen Have done. Try reading the limitations. Oh: https://t.co/Y176XEhPxY
@benryanwriter @scottyd121 @rkfmiller @UCSDHealth Nice study. There's also this real-world study of mask mandates in Germany h/t @Jabaluck https://t.co/EJ6BzSg1DY https://t.co/xTQbbFAQdO
RT @adsquires: @sameo416 Good thread. It's wrong on the social / behavioural side too (which is what they're claiming is the significant "r…
RT @adsquires: @sameo416 Good thread. It's wrong on the social / behavioural side too (which is what they're claiming is the significant "r…
RT @adsquires: @sameo416 Good thread. It's wrong on the social / behavioural side too (which is what they're claiming is the significant "r…
RT @adsquires: @sameo416 Good thread. It's wrong on the social / behavioural side too (which is what they're claiming is the significant "r…
@ProfMarkBowman @MathsPlusPlus @Demosthenessaid @DrKGregorevic They were smart enough to get on it, early, before results could be confounded. The questions they knew to address, that Cochrane ignored. https://t.co/7Bh0iYq3C2
RT @adsquires: @sameo416 Good thread. It's wrong on the social / behavioural side too (which is what they're claiming is the significant "r…
@sameo416 Good thread. It's wrong on the social / behavioural side too (which is what they're claiming is the significant "real world" aspect lab studies miss). RCTs aren't necessarily the "gold standard" for studying mandates at a population level https:/
@GidMK @luckytran What publications have assessed mask mandates? The RCTs couldn't by definition. The NEJM Boston diff-in-diff found a significant effect (but people didn't like that one) and so did this German synthetic control https://t.co/jLXedyKdVc
@humftydrumpfty Finding out it’s not so would have been easy. Why didn’t you do the work? https://t.co/7Bh0iYq3C2
@KLHM2010 @DFisman @flindall_steve @FurnessColin @TRyanGregory @linseymarr @kprather88 @deonandan @BarryHunt008 Also: the Cochrane study only included RCTs, which cannot study actual mask mandates in entire populations (and indeed, often had poor complianc
@kevinnbass The questions that *weren’t* asked are in this study. The US bubble is self-confirming to a disturbing degree. https://t.co/7Bh0iYq3C2
RT @adsquires: @PrasadKasibhat1 @linseymarr @JenniferNuzzo @Globalbiosec When compliance is high, as in a legally enforced mask mandate the…
@PrasadKasibhat1 @linseymarr @JenniferNuzzo @Globalbiosec When compliance is high, as in a legally enforced mask mandate they show a large effect (nearly 50% reduction) at the population level. https://t.co/EJ6BzSg1DY The RCTs were informative about whethe
@sdbaral @Theophilus_TP @BallouxFrancois @Jabaluck @akm5376 That's my point - there is clear evidence of their significant population impact eg https://t.co/EJ6BzSg1DY - but different RCTs show that that particular way of getting people to wear them may no
@kevinnbass @greenstanion Also - we have 50yrs of mask studies going back to 70’s mining. Millions in metal fab, ag, ceramics, spray applications, food production, bio hazards, bldg rehab, more wear masks every day to protect against aerosols. It’s being l
@Montaigne01 @BallouxFrancois This is a real world study https://t.co/EJ6BzSg1DY
@AbundantLandUse It would seem, Monica either does not read much or does not understand much. 👇🏼 https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/phFDltIewq https://t.co/eAnvspxQhb https://t.co/PpuNyuDtvO https://t
@Dave99117584 @kprather88 @LizHighleyman @Slate @CochraneLibrary @JenniferNuzzo @Jabaluck @VPrasadMDMPH Not looking for perfection, just enough consistency to make a difference. I guess it depends on what question you ask. I suspect this was possible, but
RT @WolfmannotJack: @LizHighleyman What do you mean “high-quality evidence for their effectiveness at the community or population level is…
@LizHighleyman What do you mean “high-quality evidence for their effectiveness at the community or population level is still lacking”? Have you read any of these publications? There are more. https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/
RT @pelagicbird: 2/ Und trotz dieser grundsätzlichen methodischen Problematik gelingt es gar nicht so selten... surprise, surprise. Die Erd…
@Casey151170 @benryanwriter @apsmunro But it also means you can do some comparisons with culturally very similar regions (certainly closer than Florida and California!) And what do you find? "we conclude that face masks reduce the daily growth rate of re
@Friedemann1 Hierzu passend noch weitere Literaturstellen: https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/gkK2RzCIc3 https://t.co/phFDltIewq https://t.co/PpuNyuDtvO https://t.co/AvnjkT9tqJ https://t.co/cF8VSTgnlX https://t.co/3wtJ4HylZ
@SabineHammer24 Und solche Studien gibt es. Diese Art von Studien sind wichtig, wenn RCT zB aus ethischen Gründen nicht machbar sind. Observational studies sind daher für die EBM genau so valide und relevant wir RCTs. https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co
RT @DrCanuckMD: And another all the way back from 12/2020 showing masks reduce transmission. https://t.co/9gJK7vFXKt
@Humble_Analysis @JonPloug @apsmunro Your wife and kids are to be pitied. FFP2/KN95/N95 masks (respirators) protect from sub-µm particles such as virus-laden aerosols. https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/tfBSl0p78v https://t.co/
@doc_ecmo @apsmunro Quite. Observational studies such as these are as much part of EBM as RCTs, especially, when RCTs either are not feasible or will not get ethical approval (or both). https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/EOT9Zx
RT @psychunseen: 7/ Including this one that concluded "that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infe…
RT @psychunseen: 7/ Including this one that concluded "that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infe…
RT @psychunseen: 7/ Including this one that concluded "that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infe…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @anna46977604 So isses.👍🏼 Hierzu ein paar Studien: https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/tfBS…
@TamarHaspel ➡️ Here are links to examples of observational / comparative (pre v. post difference) studies which demonstrate that masks, i.e FFP2/N95 respirators reduce infection/transmission. https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/k7nZc6JmlN https://t.co
RT @psychunseen: 7/ Including this one that concluded "that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infe…
@marko_kovic Hierzu ein paar Beispiele: https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/k7nZc6JmlN https://t.co/phFDltIewq https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/X6KepC3WSr
@marko_kovic 👏🏼 Noch ein weiterer Auszug aus der Literatur: https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/tfBSl0p78v https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/phFDltIewq https://t.co/k7nZc6JmlN https://t.co/PpuNyuDtvO https://t.co/AvnjkT9t
RT @H_Herrmann24: "Laboruntersuchungen reichen nicht" ? - Dann gehen wir eben zu Felduntersuchungen, dies ist die bekannte #Jena - Fallstu…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @anna46977604 So isses.👍🏼 Hierzu ein paar Studien: https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/tfBS…
@anna46977604 So isses.👍🏼 Hierzu ein paar Studien: https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/tfBSl0p78v https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/phFDltIewq https://t.co/k7nZc6JmlN https://t.co/PpuNyuDtvO https://t.co/AvnjkT9tqJ http
"Laboruntersuchungen reichen nicht" ? - Dann gehen wir eben zu Felduntersuchungen, dies ist die bekannte #Jena - Fallstudie. Alles Unsinn ? Wieder @PNASNews = https://t.co/WGBQsjrV4g 6 https://t.co/lFaaMzN5Dq
RT @pelagicbird: @BMauschen Hier sind einige gesammelt. Und dann noch diese: https://t.co/42J4OJr2KQ https://t.co/MBaWtoYloi
@provinzbankster @HanefeldMarc Der Nutzen von Masken konnte nicht belegt werden? Ach was? https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/tfBSl0p78v https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/phFDltIewq https://t.co/k7nZc6JmlN https://t.co/PpuN
@docdu16 @ReLoadFluid @Gandalf59624584 @lolbrun @EricBillyFR @Pr_Logos @LehmannDrC @SaiyanBio @cochranecollab @DavidHajage @Mimiryudo avait compilé pas mal de lien d'études ( ok qualité variables mais les cclo sont tjrs un bénéfice ) https://t.co/26fI2rsAT
@lastword4me2a @cheesenuggz @BitcoinBuddhist @Dave_Calls_BS @unvackist @Debunk_the_Funk You want to see more? https://t.co/9Kcfl1iSHA
7/ Including this one that concluded "that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%." https://t.co/i7xXhuthCV
@BMauschen Hier sind einige gesammelt. Und dann noch diese: https://t.co/42J4OJr2KQ https://t.co/MBaWtoYloi
@BMauschen Hier Studien, auf die ich ohne suchen zu müssen zugreifen kann. Es fehlen aber noch einige, deren links ich erst ausgraben muß. https://t.co/YbitluMz5w https://t.co/YtfktcyoyM https://t.co/tfBSl0pEY3 https://t.co/EOT9Zx0QR5 https://t.co/phFD
@BMauschen @WolfmannotJack hat hier ein paar: https://t.co/5fQ69JgDxm
@defrino_janet @Mrmangajojo @BawdenTom Debatable. I’m not sure this debate has an easy resolution. Population studies like the one below have too many confounding factors which is why results are all over the map. Lab studies suggest high quality well-fitt
@SFugenschuh @AlexanderKekule Der Nutzen von Masken ist immer noch nicht erwiesen? Ach? Sie lesen wohl nicht viel oder nur das, was Ihre Vorurteile bestätigt? https://t.co/YbitluMz5w https://t.co/YtfktcyoyM https://t.co/tfBSl0pEY3 https://t.co/EOT9Zx0QR
@JoBencke @one_and_only_87 @_MartinHagen 👍🏼 Diese Cochrane Review ist mit vielen Einschränkung und daher mit ebenso vielen Caveats behaftet, die von den Autoren selbst betont werden. Observational studies an Bevölkerungs-/Berufsgruppen wie diese wurden nic
@Ella_von_T @RainerNP2 @DrScheuch @chefofmembers @Karl_Lauterbach @_b_meyer @BMauschen Obwohl die 2023 Version der Cochrane Review Studien bis Oktober 2022 evaluiert, wurden zB diese Studien nicht inkludiert. Sie werden nicht einmal in der Rubrik “studies
@snorman1776 @MonitorFake @Jim_Jordan These studies say you are wrong about masking. https://t.co/7Sjxflw140 https://t.co/PwPtJrhyub https://t.co/U1IdvxzMCu https://t.co/cdGDxv2sIY https://t.co/qPfLNaw2PN https://t.co/qaiao6aZEE https://t.co/rQxa1z
RT @pelagicbird: 2/ Und trotz dieser grundsätzlichen methodischen Problematik gelingt es gar nicht so selten... surprise, surprise. Die Erd…
RT @pelagicbird: 2/ Und trotz dieser grundsätzlichen methodischen Problematik gelingt es gar nicht so selten... surprise, surprise. Die Erd…
2/ Und trotz dieser grundsätzlichen methodischen Problematik gelingt es gar nicht so selten... surprise, surprise. Die Erde ist doch keine Scheibe. https://t.co/MBaWtoYloi
@mamasaurusMeg @Ram1725 @Doctor_Eric_B @brownstoneinst I think you cropped the graph out of its full context because it's not from a real study, but let's talk about German mask use https://t.co/ZKnEWoyptV
RT @JTMDPhD1: @mph_for_doctors https://t.co/KRnuOY9jwG おまいは読めないだろうが数字で出とるよ。
RT @JTMDPhD1: https://t.co/KRnuOY9jwG おまいは読めないだろうが、45%reduceだってよ。
RT @JTMDPhD1: https://t.co/KRnuOY9jwG おまいは読めないだろうが、45%reduceだってよ。
@mph_for_doctors https://t.co/KRnuOY9jwG おまいは読めないだろうが数字で出とるよ。
https://t.co/KRnuOY9jwG おまいは読めないだろうが、45%reduceだってよ。
@Hohounk @NGSavage91 @CobraKel @kindasimple This study estimated that a mask mandate in Germany reduced new infections by 45%: https://t.co/1q6ma94TD0
@GournayEddy @GuillaumeBarucq @barriere_dr 6 études Théorie/Modélisation > Pas d'étude pratique groupe avec/sans, ne démontrent rien https://t.co/cP4KErjV0B https://t.co/kstm7JqHum https://t.co/2ebjoCoEEs https://t.co/n28OuOe2kX https://t.co/YdD65U7xcz
RT @DrCanuckMD: And another all the way back from 12/2020 showing masks reduce transmission. https://t.co/9gJK7vFXKt
RT @DrCanuckMD: And another all the way back from 12/2020 showing masks reduce transmission. https://t.co/9gJK7vFXKt
@ClarkeMicah Do you also look at studies that reach the opposite conclusion? eg https://t.co/zjSbhcyGsn and https://t.co/YO2mARyQgT
@zombiegeordie @DrAseemMalhotra https://t.co/HoZSK1meAk. Errrrm. Germany, so what were you reading.
@EssexPR @PSDuffy https://t.co/P9L8FRQVX9. As for Germany, perhaps you can share your study.
@Flipper628 @pi_mij @khadastrophic The impact of masking in Germany? https://t.co/fTqhgTf0c7 https://t.co/U1uILSdtEa
RT @DrCanuckMD: And another all the way back from 12/2020 showing masks reduce transmission. https://t.co/9gJK7vFXKt