↓ Skip to main content

A Performance Comparison of Commonly Used Assays to Detect RET Fusions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
38 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Performance Comparison of Commonly Used Assays to Detect RET Fusions
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2021
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soo-Ryum Yang, Umut Aypar, Ezra Y. Rosen, Douglas A. Mata, Ryma Benayed, Kerry Mullaney, Gowtham Jayakumaran, Yanming Zhang, Denise Frosina, Alexander Drilon, Marc Ladanyi, Achim A. Jungbluth, Natasha Rekhtman, Jaclyn F. Hechtman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Other 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,106,731
of 22,150,339 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#758
of 12,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,398
of 501,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#29
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,150,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.