↓ Skip to main content

Planetary Cave Exploration Progresses

Overview of attention for article published in Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Planetary Cave Exploration Progresses
Published in
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, December 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020eo152045
Authors

Timothy Titus, Charity Phillips-Lander, Penelope Boston, J. Wynne, Laura Kerber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,011,775
of 18,964,669 outputs
Outputs from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#242
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,412
of 448,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#26
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,964,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.