↓ Skip to main content

Western purple martin (Progne subis arboricola) occurrence on the Siuslaw National Forest, Summer 2019

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Western purple martin (Progne subis arboricola) occurrence on the Siuslaw National Forest, Summer 2019
Published in
US Geological Survey, December 2020
DOI 10.3133/ofr20201130
Authors

Hagar, Joan, Branch, Eric

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,468,130
of 20,416,887 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#904
of 1,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,609
of 484,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,416,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.