↓ Skip to main content

Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
217 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink
Published in
Nature Climate Change, December 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00944-0
Authors

J. Loisel, A. V. Gallego-Sala, M. J. Amesbury, G. Magnan, G. Anshari, D. W. Beilman, J. C. Benavides, J. Blewett, P. Camill, D. J. Charman, S. Chawchai, A. Hedgpeth, T. Kleinen, A. Korhola, D. Large, C. A. Mansilla, J. Müller, S. van Bellen, J. B. West, Z. Yu, J. L. Bubier, M. Garneau, T. Moore, A. B. K. Sannel, S. Page, M. Väliranta, M. Bechtold, V. Brovkin, L. E. S. Cole, J. P. Chanton, T. R. Christensen, M. A. Davies, F. De Vleeschouwer, S. A. Finkelstein, S. Frolking, M. Gałka, L. Gandois, N. Girkin, L. I. Harris, A. Heinemeyer, A. M. Hoyt, M. C. Jones, F. Joos, S. Juutinen, K. Kaiser, T. Lacourse, M. Lamentowicz, T. Larmola, J. Leifeld, A. Lohila, A. M. Milner, K. Minkkinen, P. Moss, B. D. A. Naafs, J. Nichols, J. O’Donnell, R. Payne, M. Philben, S. Piilo, A. Quillet, A. S. Ratnayake, T. P. Roland, S. Sjögersten, O. Sonnentag, G. T. Swindles, W. Swinnen, J. Talbot, C. Treat, A. C. Valach, J. Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 217 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 40 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 424. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#37,849
of 17,940,342 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#180
of 3,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,745
of 416,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#9
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,940,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.