↓ Skip to main content

Structure-retention relationship study of polyoxygenated steroids

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography), September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure-retention relationship study of polyoxygenated steroids
Published in
Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography), September 2012
DOI 10.1002/jssc.201200423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomislav Tosti, Maja Natić, Dragana Dabić, Dragana Milić, Dušanka Milojković-Opsenica, Živoslav Tešić

Abstract

The chromatographic behavior of 31 newly synthesized polyoxygenated steroids was investigated by the means of reversed-phase planar chromatography. Retention data were correlated to molecular characteristics of the analytes with view to examine possible relationships by the means of multiple linear regression (MLR) and partial least square (PLS) regression. On the basis of comparison of the statistical parameters obtained for both MLR and PLS models, descriptors best describing the analyte behavior were selected. Statistically significant and physically meaningful structure-retention relationships were obtained. Calculated lipophilicity expressed as XlogP as well surface tension and Hansen hydrogen bonding was included in both MLR and PLS models.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Professor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 60%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#9,742,809
of 12,189,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography)
#767
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,668
of 122,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography)
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,189,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.