You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013413.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya Vijayaraghavan, Holly Elser, Kate Frazer, Nicola Lindson, Dorie Apollonio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Ireland | 3 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 118 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
| Psychology | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 127 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,145,584
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,241
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,040
of 530,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.