↓ Skip to main content

Adaptação cultural para o Brasil da escala Tuberculosis-related stigma

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptação cultural para o Brasil da escala Tuberculosis-related stigma
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015217.10582015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliane de Almeida Crispim, Michelle Mosna Touso, Mellina Yamamura, Marcela Paschoal Popolin, Maria Concebida da Cunha Garcia, Cláudia Benedita dos Santos, Pedro Fredemir Palha, Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio

Abstract

The process of stigmatization associated with TB has been undervalued in national research as this social aspect is important in the control of the disease, especially in marginalized populations. This paper introduces the stages of the process of cultural adaptation in Brazil of the Tuberculosis-related stigma scale for TB patients. It is a methodological study in which the items of the scale were translated and back-translated with semantic validation with 15 individuals of the target population. After translation, the reconciled back-translated version was compared with the original version by the project coordinator in Southern Thailand, who approved the final version in Brazilian Portuguese. The results of the semantic validation conducted with TB patients enable the identification that, in general, the scale was well accepted and easily understood by the participants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 36%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#9,625,052
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#400
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,996
of 256,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.