↓ Skip to main content

Systematic evaluation of three different commercial software solutions for automatic segmentation for adaptive therapy in head-and-neck, prostate and pleural cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic evaluation of three different commercial software solutions for automatic segmentation for adaptive therapy in head-and-neck, prostate and pleural cancer
Published in
Radiation Oncology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-7-160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariangela La Macchia, Francesco Fellin, Maurizio Amichetti, Marco Cianchetti, Stefano Gianolini, Vitali Paola, Antony J Lomax, Lamberto Widesott

Abstract

To validate, in the context of adaptive radiotherapy, three commercial software solutions for atlas-based segmentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Other 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 33%
Physics and Astronomy 39 24%
Computer Science 12 7%
Engineering 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,408
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,603
of 170,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.