↓ Skip to main content

Time‐to‐detection occupancy methods: performance and utility for improving efficiency of surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time‐to‐detection occupancy methods: performance and utility for improving efficiency of surveys
Published in
Ecological Applications, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/eap.2267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Halstead, Jonathan P. Rose, Patrick M. Kleeman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 60%
Environmental Science 5 20%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 4 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,263,110
of 17,658,188 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,039
of 2,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,622
of 407,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,658,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.