@DaveAnotherdave @gurillaapp @CaulfieldTim Here's the study on the Pfizer vaccine. It takes extra gullibility and ignorance to conclude that if the vaccine wasn't tested for transmission it wasn't tested for symptomatic infection, which is what is actually
@ToeNegro Badania na podstawie których dopuszczono szczepionkę już nie były korelacyjne. https://t.co/lW1bOyALIr
@Rosselanor1 @ACM94JAP @noncontextreply @InternetH0F This was the "Clinical Trial" Pfizer preformed on the mRNA vaccine before rolling out a new technology to the entire global population. https://t.co/36YPDwgnp2
@boianspeaks @gentle_class7 @GidMK You can spam that image as much as you want, as you're being reported for it. No one sensible + informed is going to fall for your ecological analysis that's riddled with confounding, when there are controlled studies th
@tnerbs20 @TroyWestwood here is Pfizer's: https://t.co/T6bdU6idw6
@BobRoss54314105 @DrNice2022 @StakerTroy Demonstrate proof of your claims here, please include commentary on the robustness of the methodology & statistical power of the data. Point to study design, endpoints, & outcomes. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@hiro__iwata その"証拠"が見えない人達。 https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR https://t.co/jY943RlNMW
@Taggs83291507 @wannabeerbad @KinseyKat1 @TSchlanders @Censored4sure @TTAVOfficial No. Day 1 was 95% https://t.co/kMq7cZNTHY The disease evolved to escape immunity (both infection and vaccination) and that changed effectiveness. https://t.co/yOe5bw
@Michele85277329 @wannabeerbad @KinseyKat1 @TSchlanders @Censored4sure @TTAVOfficial Definitely helps against covid. https://t.co/kMq7cZNTHY Miniscule safety issues. An order of magnitude less than the reduction in risk from covid.
@BaronRais @Censored4sure They were true https://t.co/kMq7cZNTHY
@WDRTW77 @wannabeerbad @KinseyKat1 @TSchlanders @Censored4sure @TTAVOfficial https://t.co/kMq7cZNTHY It objectively was.
RT @ikkealweer: @DrBenTapper1 Never tested on children and pregnant women!!! 💉💉💉 https://t.co/RfJHKnoSl9 https://t.co/ANtZMAnxPb
@SusanMeyen @GoodRanchers I have, there are scientific journals backing this up, here are links to some studies talking about how mRNA vaccines work along with the saftey and efficacy of them. https://t.co/nIwjvGUEiJ https://t.co/Qf6nMIR7jU https://t.co
@art_burke @DrBenTapper1 BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine : Children and pregant women excluded from the trials. https://t.co/RfJHKnoSl9 https://t.co/QBaqY1ABvL
@DrBenTapper1 Never tested on children and pregnant women!!! 💉💉💉 https://t.co/RfJHKnoSl9 https://t.co/ANtZMAnxPb
@InfiniteKB_Com @GidMK No one died of COVID in this trial. 2 vaccinated (both CVD) and 4 placebo (2 CVD) died of other causes. https://t.co/txbQP5KSXf
@FTGBSX @ButHisEmails @dense_evi @Alex_on_A14 @jsm2334 @TheDrJon @IanCopeland5 @chris_komatsu @thereal_truther @MeanderingRhode You haven't read the paper have you? https://t.co/92SZq6Xx4q
@EdKifred @MikkoKiiski4 @Aki_Nummelin Vaikka tästä https://t.co/qpYQy3LC4O . Lukee mitä on tehty ja tulokset, että ei muuta kuin toistamaan - kun tulokset täsmääkin ei siitä kauhean hyvää artikkelia saa aikaan.
Yeah, sure. That's the study that sealed the NEJM's death as a credible source. Nice try. Have a look at this while laughing all the way to the bank. https://t.co/XzbElU8YNj Or just STFU.
@jimmyfra88 @GoCats1982 @Heretic_555666 @KevinJa52749283 @MattAttack009_ You have literally zero understanding of this topic but post retarded nonsense about it on the Internet. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@TruthHurts2160 @CallMeEOnly @ButHisEmails @IamTybalt79 @notMrFarmer @hfjohnsen @kleinbluegirl https://t.co/DNFMb115eh December 2020 the first safety and efficiency
@Anpo_Star @DiedSuddenly_ There are studies that show the vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. Read it and weep for it demolishes your case. https://t.co/LFghi9sFU8
@sharificles @libertarianesqu @TeddyScape @InternetH0F Not hard to find plenty. Probably just about anything related to Covid is an easy example of how money and politics control “peer review”. https://t.co/MYLoXX3T6D
@lexquismot @CyberCoffeIT @M_Alazon @RChabriet @arikouts @GValeau On parle de Pfizer sauf si spécifié. L'efficacité mesurée par cette étude n'est applicable qu'à la population étudiée ? https://t.co/PH8dGoVl8K
@RChabriet @SahabiaAli @CyberCoffeIT @arikouts @GValeau @lexquismot L'étude de base est ici. Elle a été confirmée, et non infirmée, par les études ultérieures. Efficacité de l'ordre de 95% sur le variant d'origine. https://t.co/mlTWQxnS3f
@wideawake_media All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
@itsalongwayhome @ausdub @yeahnaa333 They’ve been trying to hide the lack of COVID information for 75 years? Nah man, you’re just insane. On the subject here’s some data that apparently didn’t exist when it came out. https://t.co/M2psuCaf5m
@VoVxsGxHfxn1DFq @KonoBellYoko VBB.1.5というか、時系列で最初からバイアスを抜きで治験データを確認されるのがいいかなと思います。 https://t.co/eUH6xlj4lM
@MissBossy628 @fabneil @mjordan73 @yay_its_james Oh FFS here let me Google that for you https://t.co/mBWZSNLD57
@camajor54 What are you talking about? "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo" The clip you shared contained false cla
@d_d_5_6 @Runningmansuzie There were six deaths during the clinical trial, two in the vaccination group, and four in the placebo group. If any steps were rushed or skipped, please advise which. Be specific. (Hint: none were.) https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo http
@Runningmansuzie Silly you. Inconclusive? I don't think so, the clinical trials literally have published their conclusions. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jhUQ https://t.co/YdW488dP9f
@camajor54 @JohnnyRivers33 It is evidence that people get things wrong. The clinical trials, Dec 2020: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among t
@AutixTheCore @JohnnyRivers33 @GilliRoth I'm unclear what you are saying, and how it relates to the unsupported claims that the data in the clinical trials were manipulated. Either you have credible evidence, or not. Here are the clinical trials for Pfiz
@shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk This, from the clinical trials in Dec 2020: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT1
RT @ByrneLuc: @SherryW36619213 @Debunk_the_Funk @soundreece The results for Phase 3 of the BioNTech & Pfizer vaccine were published in Dece…
@TomSiebert @Debunk_the_Funk @SherryW36619213 @soundreece Here's the normal vaccine testing process (see graphic). This is the link for the results from Phase 3 of the BioNTech & Pfizer vaccine: https://t.co/IXkgdn7UXs https://t.co/kbYSPYIXLf
@SherryW36619213 @Debunk_the_Funk @soundreece The results for Phase 3 of the BioNTech & Pfizer vaccine were published in December 2020. https://t.co/IXkgdn7UXs
@SherryW36619213 @Debunk_the_Funk @soundreece Vaccines go through these 3 testing phases.The Covid-19 vaccines went through the same testing process as all other vaccines. Here are the results for Phase 3 of the BioNTech & Pfizer vaccine. The previou
@TwistedTrvster @feistykind @Captaincoby00 There were peer reviewed studies required before the vaccines were approved. https://t.co/ygyT08zrGY https://t.co/OT4uR3vCUV
@cantstopmenowww Here's the clinical trial data that I sourced my data from: https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo "No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo. No Covid-19–associated deaths were observed." https://t.co/ZGpGl
@GilliRoth @shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Some got it wrong for sure. Best to rely on peer reviewed papers that document that vaccinated people got infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as in the clinica
@shanbwdn @GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Mostly, you are misunderstanding what was said, but in some cases, some did get it wrong. Best to rely on published papers on the topic. Again: https://t.c
@shanbwdn @nz_factivist You seem to be denying the existence of the clinical trials. "Never" is a big claim. "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19". You have been misled. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@shanbwdn @GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk No. That is a lie. From Dec 2020: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT
@shanbwdn @GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk And here you are, exposing yourself as gullible by saying all sorts of nonsense. In the clinical trials in Dec 2020 by documenting 8 people who were vaccinat
@shanbwdn @nz_factivist 95% efficacy is not "useless". You have been misled. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @GilliRoth @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Do you think 95% efficacy is the same as 100%? Really? Hint: they are different numbers. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @shanbwdn @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Anyone who said that the vaccines prevented all transmission was mistaken. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose a
@shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @GilliRoth @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk The objective of the mRNA Covid vaccines was to reduce serious illness and death. The clinical trials and subsequent measured the efficacy of that, not transm
@AussieFedUp Um. A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 (30 μg per dose, given 21 days apart) was found to be safe and 95% effective against Covid-19. And follow up studies show similar results. https://t.co/osLsvyWgG1(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20effic
@P_McCulloughMD @TexasLindsay_ @VigilantFox @twc_health @MakisMD @FLSurgeonGen @drcraigwax @DrNoMask But there were RCTs... https://t.co/WHuihAtFyQ
@BGatesIsaPyscho All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
@Fenbeagle @accountingetc All vaccines completed phase 3 human trials in 2020. Here is the Pfizer trial. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@accountingetc The vaccines are very safe and very effective. Why is a random accountant promoting medical conspiracy theorie from three years ago? https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@aaaabbb03268022 臨床試験の当初の試験デザインの内の最初の短期間の部分で何らかの指標について(不正等の有無はここでは無視するとして)一定の成績をとって短期的有効性と短期的安全性が確認されて(本当に?)、なぜか建前上で最善の介入行為であると看做されて、・・・ https://t.co/7jF4ughmuy
@USMortality @IanCopeland5 Are you seriously that deluded? The first two - with >75,000 people before the vaccine was even released are below. There are dozens more. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@TheCIVICSc @JohntheLyricist "Only 15% got 4 plus." You are so hopelessly lost that you are mixing up DNA and pineapples The first two studies are below. Try not avoid saying even stupider things. https://t.co/S2miJhF8pW https://t.co/nfTGNP60aY
@CitizenXjf60682 @stopvaccinating Seems like you haven't actually looked into the matter at all, have you? Super easy to find. 14,000 citation. Pretty well know. https://t.co/3xOw4k34BR
@ThomasManson420 @era1521 @RMarsh991 @Simon106229076 @JohntheLyricist @HeidiPa22668162 95% protection is the best protection from any vaccine ever. https://t.co/MwrEQZDcrK
@MemeDealin @jneill "Efficacy was based on reduced mortality after 21 days." No it wasn't. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@FQu3ncy13485 @paulwooods Ah, I follow you now. How am I not OK; how do you know? You’re not my doctor and I certainly haven’t been to you for a check up. As to the rest of your statement, perhaps you would like to tell me what you find wrong with this st
@Stoke170 @DrSusanOliver1 The efficacy was known. Read this. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@STRAT777 Can you send me the paper with the 75% increase? I didn’t see it in this paper https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@STRAT777 Can you send me the paper with the 75% increase? I didn’t see it in this paper https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@STRAT777 Can you send me the paper with the 75% increase? I didn’t see it in this paper https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@DrBillyBay Novovax https://t.co/3W7Oe8YI1E
@bentannedetout @CafeGratiss @habsrulez https://t.co/8zuTgmAlWr Non ce n’était pas expérimental
@STRAT777 Can you show me where that definition is? Here is the paper. https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
Safe and effective, Zeker weten https://t.co/gvqMfjZLfU
@xNikiStone @KuikenAndrew Dummy: there were two randomized placebo controlled trials of >75,000 people before the virus was even released. And dozens more since of >3 million people. The first two are below. https://t.co/S2miJhF8pW https://t.co/nf
@unhealthytruth @vancemurphy Since you want peer-reviewed studies, take a moment to read this one: https://t.co/H0jNoJGpyc