| Title |
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: the Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (Oceans) II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0033291720005188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Freeman, Bao S. Loe, Andrew Chadwick, Cristian Vaccari, Felicity Waite, Laina Rosebrock, Lucy Jenner, Ariane Petit, Stephan Lewandowsky, Samantha Vanderslott, Stefania Innocenti, Michael Larkin, Alberto Giubilini, Ly-Mee Yu, Helen McShane, Andrew J. Pollard, Sinéad Lambe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 40% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 36 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 70% |
| Scientists | 13 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 787 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 787 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 11% |
| Researcher | 66 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 124 | 16% |
| Unknown | 336 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 8% |
| Psychology | 59 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 111 | 14% |
| Unknown | 371 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1084. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#13,543
of 24,875,286 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#10
of 5,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#561
of 521,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.