↓ Skip to main content

The 2010 American college of rheumatology fibromyalgia survey diagnostic criteria and symptom severity scale is a valid and reliable tool in a French speaking fibromyalgia cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 2010 American college of rheumatology fibromyalgia survey diagnostic criteria and symptom severity scale is a valid and reliable tool in a French speaking fibromyalgia cohort
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary-Ann Fitzcharles, Peter A Ste-Marie, Pantelis Panopalis, Henri Ménard, Yoram Shir, Fred Wolfe

Abstract

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a pain condition with associated symptoms contributing to distress. The Fibromyalgia Survey Diagnostic Criteria and Severity Scale (FSDC) is a patient-administered questionnaire assessing diagnosis and symptom severity. Locations of body pain measured by the Widespread Pain Index (WPI), and the Symptom Severity scale (SS) measuring fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive and somatic complaints provide a score (0-31), measuring a composite of polysymptomatic distress. The reliability and validity of the translated French version of the FSDC was evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Psychology 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,501,421
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,665
of 4,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,313
of 189,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#29
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.