↓ Skip to main content

Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009154.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M, van der Linden, Michelle, Buckingham, Karen, Farquhar, Cindy, Kremer, Jan AM, Metwally, Mostafa

Abstract

Progesterone prepares the endometrium for pregnancy by stimulating proliferation in response to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which is produced by the corpus luteum. This occurs in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. In assisted reproduction techniques (ART) the progesterone or hCG levels, or both, are low and the natural process is insufficient, so the luteal phase is supported with either progesterone, hCG or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Luteal phase support improves implantation rate and thus pregnancy rates but the ideal method is still unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2004 (Daya 2004).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 45%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 4 18%
Lecturer 3 14%
Other 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 105%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Unspecified 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#10,730,393
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,135
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,900
of 118,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.