↓ Skip to main content

Methadone in post-herpetic neuralgia: A pilot proof-of-concept study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methadone in post-herpetic neuralgia: A pilot proof-of-concept study
Published in
Clinics, July 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(07)25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoel J. Teixeira, Massako Okada, Ana Sofia Cueva Moscoso, Mariana Yumi Takahashi Puerta, Lin T. Yeng, Ricardo Galhardoni, Sérgio Tengan, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#327
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,627
of 206,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.