↓ Skip to main content

Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: Results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Research, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: Results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study
Published in
Thrombosis Research, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Savas Ozsu, Tevfik Ozlu, Ayşegül Şentürk, Elif Yılmazel Uçar, Gamze Kırkıl, Esra Ekbiç Kadıoğlu, Bülent Altınsoy, Bengü Şaylan, Hatice Şen Selimoğlu, Gül Dabak, Nuri Tutar, Ahmet Uysal, Hayriye Bektas, Sevinc Sarinc, Ebru Çakır, Serap Duru, Ersin Günay, Seyma Baslilar, Gülbahar Darılmaz, Nilgün Demirci, Fusun Alataş, Ezgi Demirdöğen, Servet Kayhan, Serdar Berk, Aygül Güzel, Fatih Yakar, Fatmanur Karaköse, Selami Ekin, Nalan Demir, Ümran Toru, Dursun Tatar, Tulin Kuyucu, Özlem Kar Kurt, Nagehan Durmuş, Pınar Yıldız, Aydanur Ekici, Murat Acat, Serhat Çelikel, Mehmet Yavşan, Sibel Arınç, Ayşe Bahadır, Funda Çoşkun, Nesrin Moğulkoç, Sulhattin Arslan, İsmail Savaş

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 79%
Unspecified 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,237,270
of 16,437,187 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Research
#936
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,645
of 206,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Research
#49
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,437,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.