↓ Skip to main content

Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: Results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: Results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study
Published in
Thrombosis Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Savas Ozsu, Tevfik Ozlu, Ayşegül Şentürk, Elif Yılmazel Uçar, Gamze Kırkıl, Esra Ekbiç Kadıoğlu, Bülent Altınsoy, Bengü Şaylan, Hatice Şen Selimoğlu, Gül Dabak, Nuri Tutar, Ahmet Uysal, TUPEG Study Investigators, Hayriye Bektas, Sevinc Sarinc, Ebru Çakır, Serap Duru, Ersin Günay, Seyma Baslilar, Gülbahar Darılmaz, Nilgün Demirci, Fusun Alataş, Ezgi Demirdöğen, Servet Kayhan, Serdar Berk, Aygül Güzel, Fatih Yakar, Fatmanur Karaköse, Selami Ekin, Nalan Demir, Ümran Toru, Dursun Tatar, Tulin Kuyucu, Özlem Kar Kurt, Nagehan Durmuş, Pınar Yıldız, Aydanur Ekici, Murat Acat, Serhat Çelikel, Mehmet Yavşan, Sibel Arınç, Ayşe Bahadır, Funda Çoşkun, Nesrin Moğulkoç, Sulhattin Arslan, İsmail Savaş

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 76%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Research
#1,482
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,487
of 236,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Research
#17
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.