↓ Skip to main content

A Social Identity Approach to Person Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
A Social Identity Approach to Person Memory
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, August 2012
DOI 10.1177/0146167212455829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay J. Van Bavel, William A. Cunningham

Abstract

Evidence indicates that superior memory for own-group versus other-group faces (termed own-group bias) occurs because of social categorization: People are more likely to encode own-group members as individuals. The authors show that aspects of the perceiver's social identity shape social attention and memory over and above mere categorization. In three experiments, participants were assigned to a mixed-race minimal group and showed own-group bias toward this minimal group, regardless of race. Own-group bias was mediated by attention toward own-group faces during encoding (Experiment 1). Furthermore, participants who were highly identified with their minimal group had the largest own-group bias (Experiment 2). However, social affordances attenuated own-group bias-Memory for other-group faces was heightened among participants who were assigned to a role (i.e., spy) that required attention toward other-group members (Experiment 3). This research suggests that social identity may provide novel insights into person memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 196 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 29%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 124 61%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,110,039
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#1,084
of 2,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,874
of 170,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.