↓ Skip to main content

The use of Reamer–irrigator–aspirator in the management of long bone osteomyelitis: an update

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of Reamer–irrigator–aspirator in the management of long bone osteomyelitis: an update
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00068-016-0700-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. H. Tosounidis, G. M. Calori, P. V. Giannoudis

Abstract

Reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) is an innovative device that its indications have recently been expanded to the management of long bone infections. In this narrative review, we summarise the most important studies in the field and we present the current open questions pertaining to the use of RIA in the management of osteomyelitis of long bones. The relevant literature is sparse and low quality. Nevertheless, the use of RIA for infected cases has yielded promising outcomes in specialised centres. Technical aspects that merit special attention in osteomyelitis of long bones are its inapplicability in small diameter long bones, the inadequate debridement of wide metaphyseal areas and the potential bleeding sequelae. The use of RIA in open fracture management to reduce infection risk has not gained acceptance. The antibiotic impregnated nails and rods constitute a complimentary strategy for the management of infections. The use of RIA for the management of long bone infections is an innovative and promising strategy. High quality studies are needed to shed light in its efficacy compared to conventional methods of management of osteomyelitis of long bones.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%