↓ Skip to main content

Racial Capital, Abolition, and a Geographic Argument for Reparations

Overview of attention for article published in Antipode, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,008)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
twitter
41 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Racial Capital, Abolition, and a Geographic Argument for Reparations
Published in
Antipode, December 2020
DOI 10.1111/anti.12704
Authors

Joshua F.J. Inwood, Anna Livia Brand, Elise Andrea Quinn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 54%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 77%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#110,157
of 18,913,389 outputs
Outputs from Antipode
#2
of 1,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,362
of 437,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antipode
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,913,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.