↓ Skip to main content

Gastric neoplasia misdiagnosed as an eating disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gastric neoplasia misdiagnosed as an eating disorder
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462011000300017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Araújo Teixeira, Júlio Sérgio Marchini, Selma Freire de Carvalho da Cunha

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#294
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,344
of 251,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.