| Title |
Coronavirus vaccine development: from SARS and MERS to COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-020-00695-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yen-Der Li, Wei-Yu Chi, Jun-Han Su, Louise Ferrall, Chien-Fu Hung, T.-C. Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 541 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 94 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 4% |
| Canada | 20 | 4% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% |
| France | 6 | 1% |
| Dominican Republic | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 308 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 493 | 91% |
| Scientists | 23 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 165 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 7% |
| Researcher | 80 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 75 | 6% |
| Other | 168 | 14% |
| Unknown | 551 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 109 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 51 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 40 | 3% |
| Other | 213 | 17% |
| Unknown | 576 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1083. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,412
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#576
of 529,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.