↓ Skip to main content

Regional coordinators of Sao Paulo State prisons in tuberculosis and HIV coinfection care

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional coordinators of Sao Paulo State prisons in tuberculosis and HIV coinfection care
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nanci Michele Saita, Daniele Maria Pelissari, Rubia Laine de Paula Andrade, Pedro Augusto Bossonario, Mariana Gaspar Botelho Funari de Faria, Antonio Ruffino, Aline Aparecida Monroe

Abstract

to analyze the care provided to individuals with Tuberculosis (TB)-HIV coinfection in prison units in the state of São Paulo, according to the regional coordination of prisons. cross-sectional study conducted between 2016 and 2018. A structured questionnaire was applied to 112 directors or health professionals from 168 prison units. Data were analyzed by frequency distribution and multiple correspondence analysis. 92.9% of participants reported active search for respiratory symptoms, 89.3% offer the directly observed treatment (DOT) for all TB cases, 95.5% anti-HIV testing for all inmates, 92.9% offer HIV follow-up in specialized care services and 59.8% antiretroviral drugs for cases of coinfection. An association was identified between the Northwest and Central regional coordinations and deficient human resources and low performance of actions for the diagnosis and follow-up of cases. although most prison units perform planned actions for the care of coinfected persons, some places need support to guarantee access to these actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#428
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,541
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#77
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.