↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative glycaemic control for diabetic patients undergoing surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative glycaemic control for diabetic patients undergoing surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007315.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Maria Buchleitner, Montserrat Martínez-Alonso, Marta Hernández, Ivan Solà, Didac Mauricio

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of postoperative complications. Data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses point to a potential benefit of intensive glycaemic control, targeting near-normal blood glucose, in patients with hyperglycaemia (with and without diabetes mellitus) being submitted to surgical procedures. However, there is limited evidence concerning this question in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 303 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 19%
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 70 23%
Unknown 50 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Psychology 13 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 64 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,174,202
of 18,780,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,756
of 11,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,307
of 145,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,780,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.