↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative glycaemic control for diabetic patients undergoing surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative glycaemic control for diabetic patients undergoing surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007315.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Maria Buchleitner, Montserrat Martínez-Alonso, Marta Hernández, Ivan Solà, Didac Mauricio

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of postoperative complications. Data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses point to a potential benefit of intensive glycaemic control, targeting near-normal blood glucose, in patients with hyperglycaemia (with and without diabetes mellitus) being submitted to surgical procedures. However, there is limited evidence concerning this question in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 232 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 42 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,708,096
of 14,679,099 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,383
of 11,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,158
of 132,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,679,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.