↓ Skip to main content

Misplaced Neotropical Agaristinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), with descriptions of new taxa

Overview of attention for article published in Zoologia, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Misplaced Neotropical Agaristinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), with descriptions of new taxa
Published in
Zoologia, August 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1984-46702010000400009
Authors

Vitor O. Becker

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 92%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,883,568
of 21,240,621 outputs
Outputs from Zoologia
#115
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,928
of 483,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,240,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them