↓ Skip to main content

Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-6-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Fenwick, Deborah A Marshall, Adrian R Levy, Graham Nichol

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 335 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 21%
Researcher 57 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 7%
Other 73 21%
Unknown 49 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 36%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 9%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Psychology 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 81 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,707
of 8,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,790
of 171,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#22
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.