You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Recovering With Nature”: A Review of Ecotherapy and Implications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604440 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pourabi Chaudhury, Debanjan Banerjee |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 344 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 130 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 12% |
| Psychology | 35 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 21% |
| Unknown | 140 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#631,853
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#304
of 12,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,917
of 517,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#20
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.