↓ Skip to main content

Fusion4D

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
patent
9 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fusion4D
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925969
Authors

Mingsong Dou, Sameh Khamis, Yury Degtyarev, Philip Davidson, Sean Ryan Fanello, Adarsh Kowdle, Sergio Orts Escolano, Christoph Rhemann, David Kim, Jonathan Taylor, Pushmeet Kohli, Vladimir Tankovich, Shahram Izadi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 325 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 27%
Researcher 63 19%
Student > Master 61 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 13 4%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 48 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 201 61%
Engineering 51 15%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 53 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,169,936
of 16,951,449 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#189
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,733
of 263,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#15
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,951,449 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.