↓ Skip to main content

Fusion4D

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fusion4D
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925969
Authors

Mingsong Dou, Sameh Khamis, Yury Degtyarev, Philip Davidson, Sean Ryan Fanello, Adarsh Kowdle, Sergio Orts Escolano, Christoph Rhemann, David Kim, Jonathan Taylor, Pushmeet Kohli, Vladimir Tankovich, Shahram Izadi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 29%
Researcher 58 21%
Student > Master 57 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 11 4%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 183 65%
Engineering 42 15%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 37 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,814,439
of 14,884,620 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#156
of 1,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,528
of 259,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,884,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.