↓ Skip to main content

A sensitive environmental DNA (eDNA) assay leads to new insights on Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) spread in North America

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
A sensitive environmental DNA (eDNA) assay leads to new insights on Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) spread in North America
Published in
Biological Invasions, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1209-z
Authors

Andrew J. Tucker, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Christopher L. Jerde, Mark A. Renshaw, Karen Uy, Crysta Gantz, Andrew R. Mahon, Anjanette Bowen, Timothy Strakosh, Jonathan M. Bossenbroek, Jennifer L. Sieracki, Dmitry Beletsky, Jennifer Bergner, David M. Lodge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 34%
Environmental Science 26 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 16%
Unspecified 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,162
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,848
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,354
of 355,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#36
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.