↓ Skip to main content

A sensitive environmental DNA (eDNA) assay leads to new insights on Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) spread in North America

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
A sensitive environmental DNA (eDNA) assay leads to new insights on Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) spread in North America
Published in
Biological Invasions, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1209-z
Authors

Andrew J. Tucker, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Christopher L. Jerde, Mark A. Renshaw, Karen Uy, Crysta Gantz, Andrew R. Mahon, Anjanette Bowen, Timothy Strakosh, Jonathan M. Bossenbroek, Jennifer L. Sieracki, Dmitry Beletsky, Jennifer Bergner, David M. Lodge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 37%
Environmental Science 18 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Unspecified 10 13%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,697,070
of 12,317,848 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#928
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,747
of 266,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#42
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,317,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.