You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A preliminary case study of the effect of shoe-wearing on the biomechanics of a horse’s foot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.2164 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga Panagiotopoulou, Jeffery W. Rankin, Stephen M. Gatesy, John R. Hutchinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 38 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 23% |
| Engineering | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#845,421
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#880
of 14,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,788
of 362,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#19
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.