You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Excess gestational weight gain: an exploration of midwives’ views and practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-102 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jane C Willcox, Karen J Campbell, Paige van der Pligt, Elizabeth Hoban, Deborah Pidd, Shelley Wilkinson |
Abstract |
Excess gestational weight gain (GWG) can affect the immediate and long term health outcomes of mother and infant. Understanding health providers' views, attitudes and practices around GWG is crucial to assist in the development of practical, time efficient and cost effective ways of supporting health providers to promote healthy GWGs. This study aimed to explore midwives' views, attitudes and approaches to the assessment, management and promotion of healthy GWG and to investigate their views on optimal interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 42% |
Australia | 4 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Researcher | 6 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 15% |
Psychology | 10 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,616,625
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#386
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,235
of 173,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.