RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
@JimS13616993 @LiteWorkR @DanaElizabeth69 @qtbeauty @justicehall69 @james2012 @RonPaul4Constit @2ndfor1st @NULOOKREFINISH @wikileaks @Cernovich @PlaysTrumpCard @POTUS @realDonaldTrump That's nice, FirstNameInitialBunchOfNumbers. Maybe one day you'll final
@jengleruk @stkirsch Or you are an odd duck aren't you? https://t.co/q2RMtwDDSf https://t.co/ZU9edAEXyE Both show a significant reduction benefit for COVID-19, hospitalization and death in the vaccinated. Tell another lie... Come tell me this in a ro
@Thekeksociety What I believe is irrelevant. The facts and clinical evidence show that the vaccine was safe and effective.
@rickyllesor1 @CharlesWWagner1 @4Yourinformati3 Then why was the vaccine proven to be more effective than killing yourself with drug overdoses? The vaccine is proven effective: https://t.co/XvpTLqLXWx
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
@jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune responses are normal; they occur with beneficial immune responses. Learn that. 2) We already have safety studies on the vaccines, which is why y
@janiesaysyay @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @DrBenTapper1 @NestCommander Are you claiming that's happening from vaccinations? If so, where's the *clinical* evidence of harm? No, proposing mechanisms does not count as clinical evidence. https://t.co/4
@sunni__16 @Creativologist @KLVeritas No, it won't, conspiracist. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
@BarryESharp "2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline." https://t.co/OchF0ObsMa.
@Rene294974 @GlobalSovSol @BohemianAtmosp1 Here’s where I get my medical information from https://t.co/c3yGzhEoEc
@Arak_Biki @JayJack75 @CKellyUAP That's absolute nonsense. Phase 3 testing IS safety and efficacy testing. Pfizer and Moderna never tested transmission and explicitly stated they had no direct evidence of effect on transmission. You couldn't be more wron
@TXsomeone @davidphuff @TexasTribune I did. It’s why I commented on the clinical trials that happened. https://t.co/7AZIRlwFiy like this one that later became the Pfizer vaccine https://t.co/UZ5coTW0hW and this one that became the Moderna vaccine. Maybe
@joshmdecker @zap_lock Vaccinators on December 5, 2023: https://t.co/yTdqy9J73d
RT @1IDCNMI: Phase3 mRNA-1273 (Moderna) VE 94.5% สำหรับกันติด VE กันหนักกะนตายดีมาก เกือบ100% https://t.co/e72vjMxh9Z
RT @1IDCNMI: Phase3 mRNA-1273 (Moderna) VE 94.5% สำหรับกันติด VE กันหนักกะนตายดีมาก เกือบ100% https://t.co/e72vjMxh9Z
Phase3 mRNA-1273 (Moderna) VE 94.5% สำหรับกันติด VE กันหนักกะนตายดีมาก เกือบ100% https://t.co/e72vjMxh9Z
@Macj007C @RebelleChylde @IanCopeland5 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/onc
@JacksonFlash @ColinSamuels99 @thatsnotmine125 Here's the phase 3 study for the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Have you not read this before now? https://t.co/IvKUN8Udvo
@David32856757 @Cthroughme1 @plount_os @MarkWar16520311 Maybe you should look up the difference between Efficacy and Effectiveness. https://t.co/cIP8JuJAJl https://t.co/QGC036XO3m
@roadjull @Friedemann1 Have you finally learned how vaccine development + testing works yet, non-expert vaccine denialist? https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/pJZz8g78F3 https://t.co/9IA0rxAD2e
@JoveMarie2 @LanzaraRobert @brownmike023 @IanCopeland5 @FiveTimesAugust See. This is what I'm talking about. You get your medical information from Twitter and I use actual medical sources for information. Can you see the difference there? https://t.co/
@NobodyHadToDie @IraIrleague @real_seeking @IanCopeland5 More people died in the placebo group of the Moderna trial John which uses a higher dose of mRNA. If you're concerned about the deaths during the trials, why don't you get the Moderna vaccine instead
@GiggaMAGA "Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group; vaccine efficacy was 94.1%" That's how. https://t.co/yTdqy9J73d
@AlliAlli14418 @CensoredPeasant Here's a test: https://t.co/yTdqy9J73d
@Rimbau_delaire @lazlowoodbine42 @19joho You're a lost cause. I'm just using you for lulz + as an object lesson for others in baseless conspiracism and denialism. There's no more chance of getting through to you than of getting through to a flat earther,
@Rimbau_delaire @lazlowoodbine42 @19joho And you still have nothing but a bunch of paranoid ramblings typical of non-expert vaccine denialists. The vaccines passed phase 3 RCTs, and so are not experimental + fine to be on the market. Deal with it. 🤷♂️
@cantaloop888 @Think4YourselfK @Mamama44807105 @MdBreathe The difference between you and I is that I’ll change my beliefs the moment you can show a level of proof higher than this. https://t.co/c3yGzhEWtK
@RedsRepair95 Phase 1 and 2 for Pfizer were done concurrently starting in May 2020. Phase 3clinical trials lasted from July 27th, 2020 until November 18th, 2020. Moderna started phase 1 March 2020, phase 2 in June 2020. They ran phase 3, July to the end
Oh goodness, COVIDian fail again Ian CannotCope has uploaded a study which proves mRNA offers no survival advantage 101: the Pfizer trial showed just as much excess death in those who took the mRNA as those who didn’t It stopped some covid but killed t
@HutchElle @NicotineLozeng @Kovichium @jonathanstea No, lol. Here’s Moderna phase 3 analysis published in 2021 feb but trial itself was done in 2020. https://t.co/YKhDJ4JBHX
@TruthHurts2160 @mrhappy255 @kid_krappy @MiamiAllergyDoc @mjtimber2 @thereal_truther @Energyscholar68 @poshfrocks @judysimpson222 @charlespinion @stkirsch @FactsAreGood 6/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were
@MikeDonio 100,000's of us joined trials to test COVID vaccines first, so calling them "experimental" is absurd, and they can't change your genes. If they could, it'd be incredibly easy to show that seeing as billions of people have had these vaccines by n
@LCHF_Matt Now that I’ve provided proof you will change your mind right? Now that I’ve provided proof of the highest standard of scientific testing you will change your mind…right? https://t.co/c3yGzhEoEc
@MattPrinciple @JamesSurowiecki Here's the Phase 3 clinical trial. Give it a read through and let us know what part was 'woefully inadequate'. https://t.co/yTdqy9JESL
@Pourly_Educated @FiveTimesAugust If by "zero data" you mean huge trials that 100,000s of us around the world joined.. https://t.co/WrNZjuP2NH https://t.co/fJOksklZq2 https://t.co/Z4N7la9E5O
@FiveTimesAugust 100,000s of us around the world joined clinical trials to test the COVID vaccines first, and the results have been public from the start. You're just making stuff up. https://t.co/WrNZjuOuY9 https://t.co/fJOksklrAu https://t.co/Z4N7la96gg
@lets_truck Took 20 seconds. https://t.co/1x3RPhUb6r
かの界隈では、この記事がワクチンのメリットがデメリットを上回ると思っているらしい。 Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine | NEJM https://t.co/3DUVYDtFi0
@civictypeS000 そんなもん、いくらでもあるでしょ笑 提示しても読めない事や理解出来ない事がわかりましたが一応無数にあるうちの一つ添付しますね。 読んだ上で、この研究のどこが良くないのか指摘お願いします。 https://t.co/C1K2CydDuA
@Frank_Cipo @christian_fsi @FanCooler2 Hai girato uno studio scientifico che afferma l’efficacia del vaccino. Quelli che ti ho girato io? E questo? Cosa leggi qui? https://t.co/hUmzxjOK4I
@Hayekolyte @verymoisturized Efficacy has been proven. “Long term safety” studies aren’t really done for any drugs unless there are a bunch of adverse events reported that aren’t accounted for in the original clinical trials. https://t.co/AbaJLvQ2Rk
@Tartoquetsches1 @Tarawinterr @SDavodeau @JrmeBrwnCt @lolodbnc @MartinZ_uncut T'es un champion pour réécrire l'histoire toi ! Tu as lu les essais cliniques des vaccins au moins? Il y a tout un paragraphe sur la sécurité, avant même de parler de l'efficac
@Cassies103 @MDaware @RachelAlter007 No, he's just a lying grifter. The question is whether you can think critically enough to handle someone showing that. Here's 3 placebo-controlled vaccine trials, something he's saying doesn't exist: https://t.co/fJOks
@VannucciAnto1 @les_vaxxeuses @ToussMichelle Je t'en prie, éclaire-moi donc : https://t.co/0xPa1J7ATe https://t.co/7GVmxI6qWw Qu'est-ce que c'est, ça ?
1/2 Évidemment mais tweet limité à 160 caractères. Il faut juste retenir que ce n'est pas parce que ça n'a pas été étudié/mis en évidence que ça ne se produit pas. Moderna a étudié les infect asymptomatique. Pas assez de data pour la 1ère étude de phase 3.
@FlanFlinger2 @DrMatthewSweet I did, and the trials had hit their endpoints and published their results before they were rolled out. https://t.co/WrNZjuOuY9 https://t.co/fJOksklrAu
@RepMTG Because you didn’t get the message the first time:
@CallahanAutoCo @StephenKing She was never healthy, at least mentally. On the other hand, the vaccine does far more good than harm. https://t.co/MqwSlHV1Y6
@KB607500814340 @rsm3919 @louis_blanda @Carolyn1361378 What you posted has nothing to do with objective reality. Here, have some facts instead:
@LockwoodIngers1 @SpcialTK1 @TheVeto3 @MartinZ_uncut Quelles données sont tronquées ? Je te laisse relire l'essai clinique d'un vaccin ARN contre le Covid et me dire qu'elles sont les données tronquées dans cette étude. https://t.co/QCUriOPWSF
@USMortality "...you have never shown any clinical benefit against illness..." This👆 is a lie Vaccines showed evidence of efficacy against illness (COVID-19). https://t.co/VtL8Ipl127 https://t.co/OydsoEtwae However they never showed efficacy against in
@bippitygiggity @Christii3131 @JeromeAdamsMD @bickfordblue Yes, they also captured deaths. Despite the large number of people in these trials, trials are not powered enough to statistically measure for deaths. Again, please learn how trials work. Listen t
@mikecarr000 @DustyRoseYYC 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner Anyway, controlled studies on ive…
@TheGammon3 @GetSchwifyinere I've provided you with multiple large scale clinical trials that occurred before they were rolled out, not that they're hard to find with Google. But I get it Dave, you have to ignore them because they challenge the lies you li
@TheGammon3 @GetSchwifyinere Your screenshot doesn't have a date on it, and I've already gone over this. And again, yes, tested, here's a link to all of the trials, including Pfizer's one. https://t.co/6VDJ5uAZKo
@TheGammon3 @GetSchwifyinere Pfizer: https://t.co/WrNZjuOuY9 Moderna: https://t.co/fJOksklrAu AZ: https://t.co/qbLdbIkIpT Novavax: https://t.co/Z4N7la96gg Sanofi: https://t.co/u67EazOmmA
@statonomic @cantsuicideus @stkirsch @SwaledaleMutton Here it is for humans too Pfizer: https://t.co/nllMjSWhu1 Moderna: https://t.co/k0fw5knEVW
@NPodman @CarlMattis1 Forcerade vaccin? Vad menar du? De gick igenom fas 3-studier. Tog 9 månader alla tester ju… https://t.co/L79VdAfbXs
@MiskelWilliam @EnnnDeee @MeetJess 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h
@bree_aignagh @SimonBunce63 @GetSchwifyinere @FredEast11 For reference and the benefit of anyone interested in the study https://t.co/i0if9vJpRt
@MichaelZentz @MarkWar16520311 Because no amount of evidence would put vaccine denialists at ease, by definition. You engaging in tone trolling does not change this. https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/1ojDdYvOBp https://t.co/gv
@BarryESharp @WanderLight2020 @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc @GidMK Re: "They were never successfully used in humans to prevent disease before their release for Covid." https://t.co/Pxrf5MsRZ5 Another disingenuous fabrication from you, as anyone wh
@BarryESharp @WanderLight2020 @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc @GidMK I don't care what that non-expert vaccine denialist account has to say, anymore than I'm interested in the ideological ramblings of a flat Earther. I'm interested in what the publi
@BarryESharp @WanderLight2020 @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc @GidMK Your incompetence is showing again, non-expert vaccine denialist. The EUA was not about whether they were "experimental". In medical science, RCTs are experiments. Once you pass t
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @trillionofcells @weldeiry @marcus_buggert @JonathanSarfat1 @gorskon @RandPaul @c0nc0rdance Learn what the evidence pyr…
@trillionofcells @weldeiry @marcus_buggert @JonathanSarfat1 @gorskon @RandPaul @c0nc0rdance Learn what the evidence pyramid is, you incompetent charlatan. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
@EYESOPN @Samissickofit @JoeyMannarinoUS This one study shows .1% to .15% were associated with SAE Here’s peer reviewed research found “no safety concerns” Touché We can do this all day - I will line up with my Dr colleagues every time to get the booster
@trillionofcells @dr_jon_l Like I said, you don't know how to read the medical literature, nor what terms like 'evidence hierarchy' mean. If you did, then you'd know what "probably" means in Cochrane meta-analyses + their systematic reviews when discussin
@skane2600 @DrSusanOliver1 Industry sponsored: https://t.co/RfvkBhbEKu 🚩Underpowered with conflicts of interest = weak & confounded data. https://t.co/RfvkBhbEKu https://t.co/uzrN8gtK5g
@DaleShaw3rd @AnneFroment @liberal_party 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/o
@GiggaMAGA @WhiteLace83 @AlBowers1 @Bman78518518 @19joho I can provide the one thing you will never be able to provide. Proof. https://t.co/c3yGzhEWtK
@ShawnFREEDOM22 @CartlandDavid Efficacy was based on disease severity, hospitalization, and deaths Pls define what end goal you were looking for to define the vaccine efficacy? https://t.co/pcnfXakZ5y https://t.co/IVmKspf2XU
@leveller23 @IanCopeland5 Yes, I know the book - it's the same old anti vax tropes that exploit people's lack of knowledge. A placebo controlled trial here: https://t.co/IvKUN8Udvo
@unclejuejue @twobenjamins @Adapa69 @thereal_truther @TheChiefNerd Since you think you are so smart, tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t
@out_brazil @MakisMD @DrKellyVictory @twc_health @ABDanielleSmith Daily Clout is not a real source and lies all the time. Refer to the actual sources. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E https://t.co/qlF1YSVokK
@ToonVanBeek1 @peter_risselada @Beach_Roy33 En om nog maar eens aan te geven wat vor leugenaar je bent. Hier voor moderna. https://t.co/ed1wpxT59p
@VPrasadMDMPH Randomized Trial👇 You can be sceptical about protection from infection, transmission, death but...at least short-term efficacy against symptomatic disease is was proven, easily. You're Mr. "Randomized, DB, PBL-controlled", so give it up. h
👉3. Moderna publicó un artículo en el New England Journal of Medicine en febrero de 2021, todavía con un límite de seguridad del 25 de noviembre de 2020. •3 placebo •2 vacuna La mitad de las muertes de cada grupo ya han desaparecido. https://t.co/qw1X87SL
@JTHeppy @Charalanahzard "experimental" Hey quick question. What experiment comes after double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, peer reviewed clinical trials? Because the scientific community would love to hear about it. https://t.co/c3yGzhEWtK
@Mr_Nobody_sorta @Ken__kaneki33 @RemondAlex4 Tenez j'ai réussi à écrire le nom d'une partie des études utilisé, bonne lecture. https://t.co/y1Rv17n52i https://t.co/9nNp2UZVDy https://t.co/u2wIjDyFSe https://t.co/FUm2iQ7WvH https://t.co/iLcMniozsN
@paule40673239 @Annette_LEXA @PatriceMalta @aur_rousseau Je ne sais pas ce que vous appelez des vaccins traditionnels mais c´est faux pour les vaccins contre le Covid-19. Exemples d´essais de phase 3 : https://t.co/DlZYFZYMGn https://t.co/4XLsNp0xNp
@MDRichardson6 @goddeketal 1. What exactly about the vaccine trial data do you think is "thin"? https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl https://t.co/fJOksklrAu https://t.co/6E9YSACS6z 2. What ingredients "troubled" you? The tiny little bits of oil that protect the mRNA j