Title |
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2035389 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lindsey R Baden, Hana M El Sahly, Brandon Essink, Karen Kotloff, Sharon Frey, Rick Novak, David Diemert, Stephen A Spector, Nadine Rouphael, C Buddy Creech, John McGettigan, Shishir Khetan, Nathan Segall, Joel Solis, Adam Brosz, Carlos Fierro, Howard Schwartz, Kathleen Neuzil, Larry Corey, Peter Gilbert, Holly Janes, Dean Follmann, Mary Marovich, John Mascola, Laura Polakowski, Julie Ledgerwood, Barney S Graham, Hamilton Bennett, Rolando Pajon, Conor Knightly, Brett Leav, Weiping Deng, Honghong Zhou, Shu Han, Melanie Ivarsson, Jacqueline Miller, Tal Zaks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,910 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1309 | 10% |
United States | 1116 | 9% |
Japan | 502 | 4% |
Canada | 250 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 248 | 2% |
France | 198 | 2% |
Thailand | 192 | 1% |
Turkey | 169 | 1% |
Argentina | 154 | 1% |
Other | 1704 | 13% |
Unknown | 7068 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11294 | 87% |
Scientists | 916 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 541 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 146 | 1% |
Unknown | 13 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6373 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 777 | 12% |
Researcher | 681 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 540 | 8% |
Student > Master | 492 | 8% |
Other | 391 | 6% |
Other | 979 | 15% |
Unknown | 2513 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1354 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 637 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 263 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 261 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 221 | 3% |
Other | 901 | 14% |
Unknown | 2736 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10510. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#164
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#18
of 32,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15
of 530,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.