↓ Skip to main content

Is diagnosis enough to guide interventions in mental health? Using case formulation in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
757 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is diagnosis enough to guide interventions in mental health? Using case formulation in clinical practice
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig A Macneil, Melissa K Hasty, Philippe Conus, Michael Berk

Abstract

While diagnosis has traditionally been viewed as an essential concept in medicine, particularly when selecting treatments, we suggest that the use of diagnosis alone may be limited, particularly within mental health. The concept of clinical case formulation advocates for collaboratively working with patients to identify idiosyncratic aspects of their presentation and select interventions on this basis. Identifying individualized contributing factors, and how these could influence the person's presentation, in addition to attending to personal strengths, may allow the clinician a deeper understanding of a patient, result in a more personalized treatment approach, and potentially provide a better clinical outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 757 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 755 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 148 20%
Student > Bachelor 137 18%
Student > Postgraduate 77 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Other 29 4%
Other 82 11%
Unknown 237 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 355 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 5%
Social Sciences 23 3%
Neuroscience 12 2%
Other 38 5%
Unknown 244 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,490,984
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,059
of 4,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,201
of 191,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.