You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assembling the evidence jigsaw: insights from a systematic review of UK studies of individual-focused return to work initiatives for disabled and long-term ill people
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen Clayton, Clare Bambra, Rachael Gosling, Sue Povall, Kate Misso, Margaret Whitehead |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
Researcher | 18 | 13% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 18% |
Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 32 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
Psychology | 11 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 41 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,641
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,194
of 124,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#50
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.