You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise interventions for older adults with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01555-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie M. Faieta, Hannes Devos, Prasanna Vaduvathiriyan, Michele K. York, Kirk I. Erickson, Mark A. Hirsch, Brian G. Downer, Erwin E. H. van Wegen, Diana C. Wong, Elena Philippou, Ahmed Negm, Pedram Ahmadnezhad, Shilpa Krishnan, Melike Kahya, Pallavi Sood, Patricia C. Heyn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,270,958
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#397
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,362
of 503,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.