↓ Skip to main content

Earthquake recurrence models fail when earthquakes fail to reset the stress field

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Earthquake recurrence models fail when earthquakes fail to reset the stress field
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, September 2012
DOI 10.1029/2012gl052913
Authors

T. Tormann, S. Wiemer, J. L. Hardebeck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Switzerland 2 5%
Ireland 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 37 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 82%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unknown 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2012.
All research outputs
#2,906,678
of 3,627,150 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#3,651
of 5,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,710
of 76,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,627,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.