↓ Skip to main content

Practical multispectral lighting reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practical multispectral lighting reproduction
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925934
Authors

Chloe LeGendre, Xueming Yu, Dai Liu, Jay Busch, Andrew Jones, Sumanta Pattanaik, Paul Debevec

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 49%
Engineering 9 24%
Physics and Astronomy 4 11%
Design 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#10,628,323
of 16,607,885 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1,813
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,202
of 247,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,607,885 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.