↓ Skip to main content

Effective population size remains a suitable, pragmatic indicator of genetic diversity for all species, including forest trees

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective population size remains a suitable, pragmatic indicator of genetic diversity for all species, including forest trees
Published in
Biological Conservation, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108906
Authors

Sean Hoban, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Sally Aitken, Laura D. Bertola, Martin F. Breed, Michael W. Bruford, W. Chris Funk, Catherine E. Grueber, Myriam Heuertz, Paul Hohenlohe, Margaret E. Hunter, Rodolfo Jaffé, Margarida Lopes Fernandes, Joachim Mergeay, Farideh Moharrek, David O'Brien, Gernot Segelbacher, Cristiano Vernesi, Lisette Waits, Linda Laikre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 31%
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 60%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,713,988
of 21,217,760 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,435
of 5,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,421
of 482,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#46
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,217,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.