You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scalpel versus electrosurgery for abdominal incisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005987.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charoenkwan K, Chotirosniramit N, Rerkasem K, Charoenkwan, Kittipat, Chotirosniramit, Narain, Rerkasem, Kittipan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 64% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,653,403
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,092
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,023
of 168,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.