↓ Skip to main content

Genetic structure and viability selection in the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), a vagile raptor with a Holarctic distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic structure and viability selection in the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), a vagile raptor with a Holarctic distribution
Published in
Conservation Genetics, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10592-016-0863-0
Authors

Jacqueline M. Doyle, Todd E. Katzner, Gary W. Roemer, James W. Cain, Brian A. Millsap, Carol L. McIntyre, Sarah A. Sonsthagen, Nadia B. Fernandez, Maria Wheeler, Zafer Bulut, Peter H. Bloom, J. Andrew DeWoody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Mathematics 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,715,738
of 12,340,287 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#440
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,894
of 266,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.