↓ Skip to main content

“Facts, Not Fear”

Overview of attention for article published in Science Communication, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Facts, Not Fear”
Published in
Science Communication, June 2016
DOI 10.1177/1075547016655546
Authors

Kajsa E. Dalrymple, Rachel Young, Melissa Tully

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 26%
Researcher 19 15%
Unspecified 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 33 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 31%
Computer Science 29 23%
Unspecified 26 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 14%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 10 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,078,618
of 12,520,677 outputs
Outputs from Science Communication
#122
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,325
of 257,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Communication
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,520,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.